"The well-fed never believe the hungry."
— Unknown.
(via mysharona1987)
(via mysharona1987)
(via 2ndhalfoflife)
I want to begin a church that is not a church—at least not one that most would recognize. In today’s world, few churches exist in ways that I can respect. Many churches adopt literalistic interpretations of scripture without considering either historical context or the Jewishness of first-century Christians. Many churches ignore scholarship and modern-day knowledge in order to preserve “faith” in manifestations which most would call ignorance. Many churches abandon scripture in order to re-frame a powerful movement in such a way as to effectively reduce it to a feel-good movie-of-the-week. Many churches disregard rituals which have linked Christians in community through history and throughout the world.
Put bluntly, today’s communities exist as a dichotomy—Communities of closed-minded people clinging to an ignorant interpretation of perhaps the most layered and complex collection of literature in human history or communities of liberal-minded modernists who have managed to reduce a politically-charged, radically inclusive, intense movement of fearless, self-sacrificing individuals to a loosely-interpreted and loosely-followed philosophy which holds no more merit or inspirational quality than a Berenstein Bears book. I believe this is a false dichotomy. I believe there is another way—one which religious scholars have been screaming for for decades.
It is not an easy path—it requires the zeal which seems reserved for the Evangelical movement. It requires a community deeply committed to educating its congregants and freeing scripture from centuries of misinterpretation by not only promoting biblical literacy in new ways, but employing the resources which have been available to students of secular universities for some time. Truly walking the path of the Jesus movement requires commitment to religious education that most churches are afraid to ask of their adherents, but lest we are prepared to lose Christianity to the backward lunacy of the Religious Right, we need to be prepared to challenge ourselves in new ways to restore Christianity to an educated, informed, biblically-literate movement which produces the kind of radically compassionate society that we can call a Kingdom of God.
Anyone have several million dollars for me?
As much as Jesus’ actions were calls against systems of dominance, they were also rooted in the Inter-Being of life. God makes the rain fall and the sun shine on all of us, right? That sense of Inter-Being and Love should be at the core of the Christian message, as I see it.
Jesus was a teacher and healer who felt and understood his innate divinity more than any other being.Christ is the way that the spirit and memory of Jesus vibrates and resonates in our world today.
Mary Midgley (a Religious Studies Scholar) says that when most people commit an “evil,” it is against their better self. The evil exists in this “shadow self” that we like to deny exists and pretend doesn’t. It might not tell us (hopefully) to go murdering people, but it might tell us to speed on the freeway when we don’t think there are CHP around, or something of that nature. We like to deny that this shadow is a portion of our personality.
Jung: “Painful though it is, this [unwelcome self-knowledge] is in itself a gain– for what is inferior or even worthless belongs to me as my shadow and gives me substance and mass. How can I be substantial if I fail to cast a shadow? I must have a dark side if I am to be whole; and inasmuch as I become conscious of my shadow I also remember that I am a human being like any other.”
“A text without a context is a pretext.” –Brent Walters
The layers of Biblical meaning are so intricate and sometimes hard to find that you’re cutting yourself short if you’re not coming at it from every angle possible.
The Bible was written in Hebrew and Greek. Our English translations are not only biased, but oftentimes simply literal translations. Religious scripture is not like translating “see Jane run.” Scripture has metaphorical value, poetic value, and allegorical value (among others) which are lost with literal translations. That’s why scholarly research and cultural understanding are important.
For example: During Jesus’ trial, Jesus tells Peter that he will betray him [x times, depending on version] before the cock crows. If we read that at face value, we’re imagining some rooster chillin’ in Jerusalem. However, if you understand the context, you know that 1) the “cock crow” was a term for a horn which signaled the switching of guards in the city and 2) there’s no way there would be a rooster running around in Jerusalem because it’s a holy city and such unclean animals were not allowed within its gates. In the context of this story, “before the cock crows” meant: “before midnight.” This is a small misunderstanding that is the result of ignorance on the part of translators, but imagine how many other times this happens (hello, the Bible’s kinda big) and how many other situations where that translation error could hold a lot more weight. The creation story is a shining example of this type of problem.